The Index #70: Stemming The Crypto Exodus 🗽
GM Venture Vultures ✨
The Index publishes a free briefing for crypto builders, featuring the top web3 links, news and snippets you need to read. 💀
Is the U.S. Risking a Crypto Exodus to China?
As the United States grapples with regulatory clarity for the cryptocurrency sector, a new bill proposed by U.S. lawmakers attempts to address this issue. However, the potential implications of this bill and its reception within the crypto industry and Congress might inadvertently push the industry towards China.
Proposed Regulatory Framework in the U.S.
The draft bill, introduced by House Financial Services Committee chair Patrick McHenry and House Agriculture Committee chair Glenn Thompson, aims to establish a more defined regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. The bill proposes a clear delineation of authority between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on crypto issues. It would grant the CFTC explicit spot market authority over crypto commodities under existing law and would regulate digital asset securities under the SEC.
The bill also presents a pathway to registration, allowing crypto securities to be traded on alternative trading systems under the SEC's purview. Notably, it includes provisions that would prohibit the SEC from preventing an alternative trading system from listing crypto securities and require the SEC to modify its rules to allow broker-dealers to custody digital assets.
The Risks of U.S. Regulation
Despite these promising developments, there are potential risks associated with the proposed legislation. For instance, the bill has been met with criticism due to the lack of bipartisan support, which may limit its ability to pass in a divided Congress. Furthermore, the bill is expected to undergo significant changes before becoming law, adding an element of uncertainty for the industry.
Crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Gemini have been pushing for regulatory clarity amidst expanding enforcement actions that have left companies scrambling to move operations beyond the U.S. However, the proposed regulatory clarity may come too late. The lack of clear regulation in the U.S. has led to concerns among crypto businesses about the risks of operating within its borders, potentially pushing them towards jurisdictions with more favorable regulatory landscapes.
China's Crypto Renaissance?
While the U.S. is still figuring out its stance on cryptocurrency regulation, China seems to be making strides in the opposite direction. After a ban on cryptocurrencies in 2021, Hong Kong, a special administrative region of China, has cautiously reopened to the asset class. The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission has announced a new licensing system, which will allow individual investors to buy and sell cryptocurrencies with high market caps, like Bitcoin and Ether.
The contrasting trajectories of U.S. and China's crypto regulations could lead to a significant evolution in the global crypto landscape. Entrepreneurs and business leaders interested in expanding their reach in Asia are already considering this possibility, despite the risks of doing business in China, such as strict capital controls and potential intellectual property issues.
Given China's economic influence, this has significant implications for the global crypto industry. The country's potential opening up to crypto trading could provide new revenue streams to service its debts, increase overall variability and volatility due to an influx of retail traders, and even introduce a state-controlled crypto exchange.
Moreover, recent developments suggest that China might be warming up to the idea of cryptocurrencies. Over the past week, Beijing released a white paper on Web3 technologies, affirming some commitment to supporting blockchain-related companies. This change in stance could signal a broader change in China's attitude towards digital currencies, potentially paving the way for the country to embrace crypto as the U.S. grows increasingly hostile toward the sector.
The Reading List (In 2 Minutes) 📰
Arbitrum price soars after DeFi whale address resumes ARB accumulation
The uptick in Arbitrum's (ARB) price is seemingly a consequence of substantial buying activity, predominantly attributed to respected trader and Mechanism Capital co-founder, Andrew Kang. His strategic accumulation of ARB tokens, in conjunction with the positive market sentiment following the decision of the U.S. Senate to raise the debt limit, has ignited the token's recent rally. Nonetheless, the sustainability of this increase remains uncertain. The potential formation of a bear flag in the ARB daily price chart, along with a sizeable deposit of ARB tokens into the OKX exchange, suggests potential sell pressure on the token's price.
Bloomberg’s Senior Macro Strategist Predicts More Pain Ahead For Bitcoin
Sure, it's interesting to see Bloomberg's Senior Macro Strategist, Mike McGlone, predict a bearish outlook for Bitcoin, citing factors such as potential U.S. recession, vigilant central banks, and high interest-rate competition, but on the other hand - it’s Bloomberg.
Why EA Sports and Nike think gaming NFTs can really work this time
The collaboration between EA Sports and Nike's ".Swoosh" NFT platform could potentially revitalize gaming NFTs, leveraging Nike's solid brand and the existing sneakerhead market to introduce virtual fashion in EA's gaming ecosystem, which may offset the animosity gamers have shown towards in-game NFTs previously. I still vibe with the piece I shared a few days ago - the only way web3 gaming works is if the web3 part has no real impact on the gameplay. I don’t know how insightful this is - but .Swoosh is a fucking annoying name for a platform. Make of that what you will.
Crypto policy groups call Tornado Cash sanctions ‘unprecedented and unlawful’ in new legal brief
While the U.S. Treasury Department's decision to sanction Tornado Cash is marked as "unprecedented and unlawful" by Crypto policy groups like the Blockchain Association and DeFi Education Fund, this case sparks a vital debate about whether tools enabling anonymized transactions should be targeted or the focus should remain on individual bad actors exploiting these systems. I’m a privacy maxi and I’m quite against the notion that Tornado Cash deserved to be penalised for the service they provided.
Status Update ✨
